𝙘𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙩, malibu beach avenger (
westcoasts) wrote in
etraya2024-08-11 11:59 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
text, un: hawkeye
so is pass and fail just a judgment on our performance, or do we reckon it's gonna come back and bite us in the ass in the future?
aurora said she missed us, by the way. ( those are not the words she used. ) she also said that she and eos are free to run their cities in whatever way works for the people under her care, as long as we're well-taken care of.
but, thing is, she gets to define that. says she gets to learn from her actions and inactions in relation to us.
which is something to keep in mind when we're acting as a group or not acting as a group and trying to get answers, or choosing which rules are okay to break and which rules are okay to stretch.
because between here and moorecroft, right now i'd say we've got the better end of the deal.
aurora said she missed us, by the way. ( those are not the words she used. ) she also said that she and eos are free to run their cities in whatever way works for the people under her care, as long as we're well-taken care of.
but, thing is, she gets to define that. says she gets to learn from her actions and inactions in relation to us.
which is something to keep in mind when we're acting as a group or not acting as a group and trying to get answers, or choosing which rules are okay to break and which rules are okay to stretch.
because between here and moorecroft, right now i'd say we've got the better end of the deal.
no subject
you know hank?
no subject
unfortunately.
no subject
how do you know him?
no subject
my father was a colleague of his at shield, but pym couldn't stand to be disagreed with and had him fired. set off a chain reaction that ruined my life. but we're fine now because his wife is actually quite lovely.
[and boy that's an oversimplification of the events.]
no subject
( or is he. )
and i have so many questions about shield in other universes.
( anyway.
skipping past the fact that there's no 'ex-' in front of that wife—. )
janet's amazing, you're not wrong.
no subject
shield's dead. exposed as being infiltrated and run by hydra. global terrorists either way.
and janet's the only reason pym's not being scraped off the bottom of my boot
[as if she wasn't hours away from being atomically shredded out of existence, but whatever.]
no subject
yeah, here's a tip i try and live by: don't trust anything, especially organizations, that's an acronym.
metaphorically or literally?
no subject
well maybe that advice would have been useful to me at age 6. but no i don't make a habit of trusting anything, especially not this entire set up.
yes.
no subject
and come on, most of the merchandise is cap and we all know that'd exist with or without the avengers.
great answer.
no subject
and what are the avengers 'supposed' to be about, if not causing destruction resolving the problems that they caused in the first place? and lunch boxes.
bill always talked about what an irritatingly superior bastard pym was, but it didn't quite prepare me for finally meeting him.
1/2
( but the rest of it earns a delay, a series of bubbles and dots appearing and disappearing before, finally, clint is TYPING— )
i don't think you're going to buy whatever answer i give you for that, but do you really think there'd be less problems without the avengers? it'd just be someone or something else, and i can promise you the grass is rarely greener. you don't like the avengers? that's fine, you don't have to. but if you didn't have them, maybe you'd have a bunch of guys running around being directed by norman osborn instead. or some asshole who thinks it's cool to wear a purple sock over his face.
the bad guys don't just go away if you get rid of the good guys.
no subject
being let down sucks.
especially by people who are supposed to make a difference.
no subject
turns out the avengers could barely stand each other, in the end. even they couldn't decide between them if what they were doing was right, or if they should have to be accountable to the rest of the world. fought about it at an airport they blew up, half of them got sent to the raft. they're all a bunch of incompetent petulant unprofessional self-centered reckless glory-obsessed idiots.
except scott. he's only half those things.
no subject
no-one cares about propaganda until it's coming from the wrong people, that's just how it is. doesn't mean it's right, but... there's always something coming from somewhere, and no-one's gonna say that what they're selling is the same thing as the other guy just viewed from a different lens.
( "couldn't decide between them—". well, that's familiar, he thinks, before—.
"accountable".
it's not how it went down, not for them, but— )
wait
are you talking about the shra?
no subject
[wasn't she? she's still not sure how much of it was by choice, and how much of it was not having much of an alternative as they made sure her survival was entirely dependent upon them. maybe she should have tried harder. been less naive believing that they actually intended to cure her.]
the what? no, the sokovian accords. named after the country the avengers destroyed after stark's failed robot experiment went rogue and decided to wipe out humanity. maybe it would have gotten along with whatever's running this place.
no subject
( typed, sent, wait—. "ultron was hank" probably isn't the response to have here. "wasn't it slorenia?" is probably also not great.
...nor, maybe, "I think that's more on the murderous robot than the avengers". )
we can probably chalk this one down to differences between universes.
sounds like yours got the short end of the stick.
no subject
it's fine. maybe by the end of this, mine won't be around anymore to worry about.
no subject
...just double checking i'm reading that correctly, you don't want your universe to survive?
no subject
that's coming to awfully strong conclusions. no. i just don't think it's my moral responsibility to ensure that it does above another random universe full of equally innocent people. but given how much it sucks, i wouldn't be entirely surprised that it doesn't make the cut. they plucked me out of it, after all.
no subject
and i really don't think it's as simple as 'there's only going to be one at the end of all this'.
no subject
and no, that's not what i think either. but if there's a limited number of spots, then each universe saved simply means another cannot be. so in the end roughly the same number of people and lifeforms will die, whether i pass or fail any of these tests. and so if my participation has no actual meaningful influence over the outcome of this unnecessarily drawn out and poorly constructed trolley problem, then i have absolutely no obligation to jump through hoops for the sick entertainment of the entity that designed this to fulfill their god complex.
but if it makes YOU feel better, by all means. just don't trick yourself into thinking you're better than me for it just because you're more attached to your home.
no subject
but that's exactly what i'm talking about, none of us are qualified to represent our entire worlds. ( eh, some less so than others, maybe, and it's not the first time clint's been told he's going to be JUDGED, but at least (question mark) echo's point of comparison is not a mailbox. ) but here we are. just because you don't LIKE it doesn't mean you get to pretend that's not what's happening.
and even then, it's not about being judged, not really. take that out of the equation and it's about whether someone else has the right to decide on the destruction/survival of entire worlds. if you ask me, that's not a question.
(and before you say anything, it's not an either/or. we can still be judged AND this can be a load of bull in the grand scheme of things.)
what are you gonna do while you're here? put your feet up and go around talking about how none of it's your problem because you didn't ask to be involved?
no subject
and if it's false, and simply a scare tactic to control our behavior, then giving up my autonomy for a sense of security is something is something i promised myself i'd never do again.
so what will i do? that's none of your damn business. nobody controls me anymore.
no subject
hey, so what did you say your name was? since we got friends in common and all.
( ""friends"". clint barton: hank pym apologist. )
no subject
and i don't have friends.
[a pause of her own, she means to leave it there. but. he's put up with her frustrated venting. she should probably offer him something in return.]
ghost.
[nice and impersonal.]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)