banworthy: (2)
father vincent. ([personal profile] banworthy) wrote in [community profile] etraya2024-11-15 10:02 pm

voice | un: vsmith | spoilers SH3

We're all just posing questions to each other for fun, right?

Then, is immortality wrong for mortals to experience?

[ ooc: opt-out information ]
mostdangerousbird: (212)

UN: Red Robin

[personal profile] mostdangerousbird 2024-11-18 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)
"Wrong" is a subjective term here; I don't think it's wrong. I also don't think it makes anyone happy or really does them much good at all, unless they don't care about others as individuals.
mostdangerousbird: (028 i’m a spy but on your side you see)

[personal profile] mostdangerousbird 2024-11-18 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Because there's no inate ethical objection to someone being immortal if you aren't adherent to a religion that prescribes that humans CAN'T live forever.

If someone's immortal through metahuman ability, that's not their fault and they have to make the best of it. How someone makes the best of that - I don't know. Haven't actually seen someone pull it staying a decent person after a couple hundred years.

If they make themselves immortal by choice, isn't it already obvious? Unless they're going to make everyone they care about immortal at the same time, they're going to watch everyone they know die. Maybe they'll try to have another life. But after the first few iterations, how long until they completely divest their kind on an individual level? Start thinking they're above it all. Scratch that, they already think they're above it all if they don't make everyone they care about immortal.
mostdangerousbird: (054)

[personal profile] mostdangerousbird 2024-11-19 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
If you're asking me? Wrong. If it's not their fault, I'm not going to say that they're wrong for existing as they are. It's a slippery slope between "it's not right for someone to be this type of metahuman" because of nature/gods/whatever and "so what do we do about it?"

And once a group decides to do something about it, how soon until they move onto the next "not right"? Most humans can't fly. Are the ones that can wrong?
mostdangerousbird: (083)

[personal profile] mostdangerousbird 2024-11-23 04:12 pm (UTC)(link)
The word isn't the problem. You don't need to play semantics with me.

Why are you asking about it?
mostdangerousbird: (138)

[personal profile] mostdangerousbird 2024-11-23 04:32 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a fun game to win.

[ It's a frustrating game to lose or draw at, which is usually why Tim plays it, but he's not interested in giving vsmith what he's looking for. Not fun, and not a real answer either.

You ask questions for two reasons: information-seeking or conversation-steering. Tim thinks it's the latter. So they'll go with subreasons.
]

Boredom, I guess. Compulsion for some. Societal expectations of polite conversation.
mostdangerousbird: (179)

[personal profile] mostdangerousbird 2024-11-24 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
That's the real question, isn't it?
mostdangerousbird: (078)

[personal profile] mostdangerousbird 2024-11-24 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, I'm definitely not Heartless.
mostdangerousbird: (005 will this be my final act tonight)

And now Tim thinks he's from Bludhaven.

[personal profile] mostdangerousbird 2024-11-24 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
No, I said I'm NOT Heartless.
mostdangerousbird: (197)

[personal profile] mostdangerousbird 2024-11-24 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I know. That's why I made you do it.
mostdangerousbird: (139 get older but just never wiser)

[personal profile] mostdangerousbird 2024-11-26 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
That's a lot of assumptions. Good luck with that.
mostdangerousbird: (Default)

[personal profile] mostdangerousbird 2024-12-08 05:49 pm (UTC)(link)
No. I'm stupid, remember?